We have moved to the Herengracht!Plan a visit

Approach

Writing a requirements document for software: what belongs in it and how to keep it short

24 June 20267 min readBy Sion Coolwijk

Writing a requirements document for a software project does not have to be a thick report. The point is to capture, in plain language, what the software should do, for whom and why. This article shows which parts belong in it and how to keep it from becoming a paper tiger.

Writing a requirements document is, for many business owners, the moment a software project truly begins. Not because a supplier asks for it, but because it forces you to get clear on what you actually want. The biggest reason projects overrun and get more expensive is not bad code, it is unclear expectations. A requirements document is what prevents that.

It does not need to be a hefty report. A good requirements document for an SMB project often fits on a few pages. The goal is not completeness on paper, but that you and the builder share the same picture before a euro is spent.

What belongs in a requirements document?

The order below works for almost any software project, from an internal dashboard to a customer portal. Work through it top to bottom and you have a usable document.

  • Goal and motivation: what problem are you solving and why now? One paragraph that sets the rest in context.
  • Users and roles: who will use the software and what is each type allowed to do? An admin, a customer and an employee each have different permissions.
  • Functional requirements: what should the software be able to do? Describe these as concrete actions, not features. "A customer can download an invoice" is more useful than "invoicing module".
  • Non-functional requirements: how should it work? Think speed, availability, security and which devices it should run on.
  • Integrations: which existing systems should the software talk to? Accounting, CRM, payment provider, email.
  • What is out of scope: at least as important as what is in. What are you explicitly not building yet, to prevent scope creep?

Describe what, not how

The most common mistake is prescribing technical solutions you do not yet understand. Write that customers must be able to log in securely, not which login technique to use. Write that the system must handle a thousand concurrent users, not which database that requires. The what is your domain, the how is the builder's. Guarding that separation keeps the document readable and gives the builder room to choose the best solution.

Make requirements testable

A requirement you cannot tick off is not a requirement but a wish. "The application must be fast" is not testable; "a page must load within two seconds" is. "User-friendly" says nothing; "a new employee can enter an order without training" can be judged. The more concrete your requirements, the less room for later debate about whether something was actually delivered.

A good requirements document is not the thickest one, but the one you and the builder agree on after a single read.

A tool, not a contract set in stone

A requirements document gives direction, but along the way you learn things you could not know upfront. In a good build process the document is a starting point that flexes, not a straitjacket. It belongs to the preparation of custom software, and it is exactly that preparation that decides whether a project runs smoothly or stalls halfway on revisions.

Not sure how to translate your idea into requirements? You do not have to do it alone. Schedule a no-obligation call, tell us what you have in mind, and we will help you sharpen the requirements before anything gets built.

Questions about your project?

Want to talk through
your situation?

Recognise something from this article? Drop us a line or book a call, and we'll happily think it through with you. No strings attached.

Sion Coolwijk

Sion Coolwijk

Founder Datagrove

Let's get to know each other and see if we can help. No sales talk, just a conversation about your situation.

Schedule a Google Meet